...Although you can not be sure...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
As you know I have been doing a lot of work with AI especially chatGPT which for some reason is still my favourite, especially for coding.
I think I have written enough prompts to create a massive book.
The more you use it the more you wonder how clever it really is.
If I give it the same code that it messed up on before, it messes up on it again in exactly the same way even though it finally solves it, again in the same way every time.
I certainly wouldn't trust it with making a cup of tea yet :-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning!
Yesterday I was talking about the PR Ratings shared system TTS4(11/09/2024).
Stephen who added this version emailed me with his thoughts about it.
"Although the original system is not mine, I did tweak it on 11/09/24. I'm pleased that you have commented on it.
My aim was to see if it could be turned into a system with zero losers, which it is if you change the minimum odds to 16.50 or above.
I believe 17.00 minimum-50.00 maximum produces 119 winners & 18.00-50.00 produces 104 winners to date.
The losers are there to indicate what the minimum odds should be.
Given that you now have a system which currently operates at a 100% success rate, anybody using the selections can lay them in play at the odds they feel comfortable with or lay to a liability as you have stated
The former will obviously reduce the number of winners that are matched."
Firstly an apology because when I stated the prices yesterday they were after Betfair's 1 was taken off so they should have been 16.41 and 16.13...
...Which is why over 16.50 shows no losers.
There are some interesting things with the price range and one you could look at is taking off altogether.
That takes profit up to 265.33 and LLR 3...
...dropping it down to a max of 10.00 still shows profit.
Then as it is PR Ratings you could even "quick analyse" it and see what else you can find.
Stephen's idea was to find a "No Loser" system and at the higher price range he has but I think it would have to be a "Liability".
Let me know what you think.
Click Here to find out more about PR Ratings
https://prratings.co.uk/
Until Next Time
Malcolm
I create the tools so you can create systems.